Faults of the Bohemian Massif
Source of Analytical Data on Main Faults and Faulted Areas with Seismic Potential
User Tools
krusne_hory_fault
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
krusne_hory_fault [2021/09/13 21:33] pstepancikova [General description] |
krusne_hory_fault [2022/12/06 17:25] petrs |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| ====== Krušné hory Fault ====== | ====== Krušné hory Fault ====== | ||
| **Structure ID:** \\ | **Structure ID:** \\ | ||
| Line 42: | Line 43: | ||
| The length of the Krušné hory fault system s.l. exceeds 200 km (Malkovský 1977). | The length of the Krušné hory fault system s.l. exceeds 200 km (Malkovský 1977). | ||
| - | The Krušné Hory Mountains fault as a building block of the Eger Graben | + | **The Krušné Hory Mountains fault as a building block of the Eger Graben** |
| The Krušné Hory Mountains fault is undoubtedly one of the basic building blocks of the Eger Graben, because it forms its NW edge fault and its course consistently correspond to the geometry and deep structure of this higher-order volcano-tectonic structure (Fig. 2). According to the basic idea of the development of the Ohře rift (Kopecký L. 1987), the Krušné hory fault played a subordinate role in the initial and main volcanic phases, and its more significant revival did not occur until the end of the Neogene or the Quaternary (cf. Elznic et al. 2010). | The Krušné Hory Mountains fault is undoubtedly one of the basic building blocks of the Eger Graben, because it forms its NW edge fault and its course consistently correspond to the geometry and deep structure of this higher-order volcano-tectonic structure (Fig. 2). According to the basic idea of the development of the Ohře rift (Kopecký L. 1987), the Krušné hory fault played a subordinate role in the initial and main volcanic phases, and its more significant revival did not occur until the end of the Neogene or the Quaternary (cf. Elznic et al. 2010). | ||
| Line 73: | Line 74: | ||
| The second significant feature of the Krušné hory fault in the North Bohemian Basin are changes in its direction. Malkovský (1979) defines 4 basic sections according to the direction of the fault: between Litvínov and Střelná the fault has the direction NE - SW, between Střelná and Bohosudov the direction is E - W, between Bohosudov and Telnice the direction of NE - SW, and from Telnice to the east direction of E - W. It is noteworthy that the E - W direction acquires a fault where the subsoil is formed by granitoid rocks. | The second significant feature of the Krušné hory fault in the North Bohemian Basin are changes in its direction. Malkovský (1979) defines 4 basic sections according to the direction of the fault: between Litvínov and Střelná the fault has the direction NE - SW, between Střelná and Bohosudov the direction is E - W, between Bohosudov and Telnice the direction of NE - SW, and from Telnice to the east direction of E - W. It is noteworthy that the E - W direction acquires a fault where the subsoil is formed by granitoid rocks. | ||
| - | Architectural elements of the Krušné Hory Mountains Fault | + | **Architectural elements of the Krušné Hory Mountains Fault** |
| More detailed characteristics of the breach in those parts of the fault where the fracture-free ejection is dominated are contained mainly in unpublished mining documentation. A published case is, for example, the work of Váně (1961), which describes the bending of a layer near Hrdlovka. The bend begins in the deepest part of the basin and from there in a section 1.5 km long, its slope gradually increases towards the Krušné hory slope up to 52 ° at the edge of the basin. In the bent part, the layer is significantly crushed (Malkovský 1985). | More detailed characteristics of the breach in those parts of the fault where the fracture-free ejection is dominated are contained mainly in unpublished mining documentation. A published case is, for example, the work of Váně (1961), which describes the bending of a layer near Hrdlovka. The bend begins in the deepest part of the basin and from there in a section 1.5 km long, its slope gradually increases towards the Krušné hory slope up to 52 ° at the edge of the basin. In the bent part, the layer is significantly crushed (Malkovský 1985). | ||
| Line 146: | Line 147: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| ===== References ===== | ===== References ===== | ||
| - | *... | + | *Adamovič, J. & Coubal, M. (1999): Intrusive geometries and Cenozoic stress history of the northern part of the Bohemian Massif. Geolines, 9, 5 – 14. |
| + | *Adamovič, J. & Coubal, M. (2020): Tektonická stavba. In Vařilová Z. (ed.): Geologie Českosaského Švýcarska. 109 – 131. Správa Národního parku České Švýcarsko. Ústí nad Labem. | ||
| + | *Bucha, V. (1993): Rozlišení zemětřesení a odpalů na lokálních seismických stanicích v severozápadních Čechách. PhD thesis, Přírodovědecká fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Praze. 96 s. Praha. | ||
| + | *Coubal, M., & .Adamovič, J. (2000): Youngest tectonic activity of faults in the SW part of the Most Basin. Geolines, 10, 15 – 17. | ||
| + | *Coubal, M., .Adamovič, J. & Bendl, J. (1991): Kinematická, | ||
| + | *Elznic, A. (1963): Severozápadní. omezení Chomutovsko - mostecko - teplické. pánve. Věst. Ústř. Úst. Geol., 38, 245 – 253. | ||
| + | *Elznic, A., Macůrek, V., Brož, B., Dašková, J., Fejfar, O., Krásný, J. Kvaček, Z., Mikuláš, R., Pešek, J., Spudil, J., Sýkorová, I., Teodoridis, V., Titl, F. (2010): Severočeská (mostecká) pánev. In: Pešek, J. (ed). Tertiary basins and lignite deposits of the Czech Republic. Czech Geological Survey, 40 – 137. | ||
| + | *Havlena V. (1982): Vznik podkrušnohorskych pánví. - Sbor. 8. exkurze uhel. geol. semináře, 5 – 9.Přírodovědecká fakulta UK a ČSMG Praha. | ||
| + | *Hibsch, J.E. (1891): Die Insel älteren Gebirges und ihre nächste Umgebung im Elbthale nördlich vonTetschen, | ||
| + | *Hurník S. - Havlena V. (1984): Podkrušnohorské hnědouhelné pánve a Krušné hory jako součásti neotektonické vrásové struktury. - Čas. min. geol., 29, 1, 55 - 67. Praha. | ||
| + | *Kopecký A. (1972a): Drobné vrásové deformace v nezpevněnych neogén-kvartérních sedimentech. - Sbor. geol. věd, G, 22, 117 - 151. Praha | ||
| + | *Kopecký A. (1972b): Hlavní rysy neotektoniky Československa. - Sbor. geol. věd, A, 6, 77 - 155. Praha. | ||
| + | *Kopecký L. (1987 - 88): Mlady vulkanismus Českého masivu. - Geologie a hydrometalurgie uranu,11, 3, 30 - 67; 11, 4, 3 - 44; 12, 1, 3 - 40; 12, 2, 3 - 56; 12, 3, 3 - 40. Vyzk. základna uranového průmyslu Stráž pod Ralskem. | ||
| + | *Král, V. (1968): Geomorfologie vrcholové oblasti Krušnych hor a problém paroviny. – Rozpravy ČSAV, řada matem.- přír. věd, 78, 9, 1 - 65. Praha. | ||
| + | *Král, V. (1985): Zarovnané povrchy České vysočiny. – Studie ČSAV, 10. 72 s. Academia. Praha. | ||
| + | *Malkovský, | ||
| + | *Malkovský, | ||
| + | *Malkovský M. (1980): Model of the origin of the Tertiary basins at the foot of the Krušné hory Mts.: | ||
| + | *Malkovský, | ||
| + | *Malkovský, | ||
| + | *Marek, J. (1985): Existuje krušnohorský zlom? Čas. Min. Geol., 30, 39 – 51. | ||
| + | *Plzák, V. (1968): Geologické poměry v prunéřovském výběžku chomutovsko-ústecké pánve. MS Geofond. Praha. | ||
| + | *Rajchl, M., Uličný, D. & Mach, K. (2008): Interplay between tectonics and compaction in a rift-margin, | ||
| + | *Rajchl, M., Uličný, D., Grygar, R. & Mach, K. (2009): Evolution of basin architecture in an incipient continental rift: the Cenozoic Most Basin, Eger Graben (Central Europe). Basin Research 21, 269–294. | ||
| + | *Rojík, P. (2004): Tektonosedimentární vývoj sokolovské pánve a její interakce s územím Krušných hor. PhD thesis, Přírodovědecká fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Praze. 227 s. Praha. | ||
| + | *Rojík, P., Fejfar, O., Dašková, J., Kvaček, Z., Pešek, J., Sýkorová, I., Teodoridis, V. (2010): Cheb basin. In: Pešek, J. (ed). Tertiary basins and lignite deposits of the Czech Republic. Czech Geological Survey, 143-161. | ||
| + | *Rybář, J. (1997): Interpretation of data about technogenic activity at the toe of Krušné Hory Mts. affecting endogenous and exogenous processes in the rock environment. Acta Montana IRSM AS CR. Series AB, 106, 4, 9 – 24. | ||
| + | *Rybář, J. & Košťák, B. (1998): Open pit mining under Krušné Hory high slopes. 8th International IAEG Congress. Proceedings, | ||
| + | *Stettner, G. (1974): The Bavarian part of the Bohemian Massif. In Mahel, M. (ed): Tectonics of the Carpathian Balkan regions. Geol. Úst. D. Štúra. Bratislava. | ||
| + | *Suess, F. E. (1903): Bau und Bild der Böhmischen Masse. In: Diener, K., Hoernes, R., Suess, F. E., Uhlig, V.: Bau und Bild Österreichs. F. Tempky, G. Freytag. Wien. Lipzig. | ||
| + | *Váně, M. (1961): Příspěvek k litostratigrafické pozici salesijských křemenců v severočeské hnědouhelné pánvi. Čas. Min.Geol., 3, 346 – 355. | ||
| + | *Váně, M. (1985): Geologická stavba podkrušnohorského prolomu a jeho tektonogeneze. Sbor. geol.Věd, Geol., 40, 147 – 181. | ||
| + | *Váně, M. (1999): Geologie Lounska pro třetí tisíciletí. – 471 s. Nákladem vlastním, Chomutov. | ||
| + | *Vilímek, V. (1996): Interpretation of new geodetic measurements on the fault slope (in Czech). MS , Přírodovědecká fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Praze. XX s. Praha. | ||
| + | *Zahálka, Č. (1914): Útvar křídový v Českém středohoří. I. Text. – 232 s. Nákladem vlastním, Roudnice nad Labem | ||
| + | *Zeman, J. (1988): Charakter neotektonické morfostruktury Krušných hor a model jejího vzniku. Věst. Ústř. Úst. Geol., 63, 333 – 342. | ||
krusne_hory_fault.txt · Last modified: 2022/12/06 17:25 by petrs
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
